SELECT INTERACTIVE OFFERS A PLUG-AND-PLAY AGENTIC STACK WITH CURSOR, CLAUDE CODE, AND LINEAR
Select Interactive is packaging a production-style agentic setup that wires Linear tickets to draft PRs using Cursor and Claude Code. Their program promises a ...
Select Interactive is packaging a production-style agentic setup that wires Linear tickets to draft PRs using Cursor and Claude Code.
Their program promises a day-one working setup where Linear tickets flow into draft PRs, terminal-native agent loops run in your shell, and AI-assisted reviews enforce human sign-off — all described here: Agentic AI Adoption | Cursor, Claude Code, Linear.
If you’re trialing agent workflows, this page lays out a concrete reference stack (.cursorrules, ticket-to-PR orchestration, CI hooks) you can mirror or pressure-test in-house.
It’s a concrete blueprint for turning tickets into PRs with agent loops, not another slide deck.
Gives leads a testable baseline to measure agentic impact on lead time and review quality.
-
terminal
Run a one-sprint pilot: route a small, well-scoped Linear backlog through their loop; measure lead time, review defects, and revert rate vs. control.
-
terminal
Validate .cursorrules and agent prompts on a representative service; confirm CI gates, ownership checks, and branch protections still hold.
Legacy codebase integration strategies...
- 01.
Start with one repo and a narrow ticket taxonomy to avoid chaotic prompt drift; keep existing review owners and branch protections unchanged.
- 02.
Add CI checks that fail on missing human sign-off or insufficient test diffs to prevent silent AI merges.
Fresh architecture paradigms...
- 01.
Bake .cursorrules, agent definitions, and Linear workflows into repo templates from day one.
- 02.
Define ticket shapes that map cleanly to draft PRs (scope, acceptance tests, rollback notes) to keep agents predictable.
Get daily CURSOR + SDLC updates.
- Practical tactics you can ship tomorrow
- Tooling, workflows, and architecture notes
- One short email each weekday